sábado, 31 de maio de 2014
Communism in Brazil and Latin American continent
Beth C.Costa
The demonstrations which began with protests against the increase in R$ 0,20 in urban rates in the city of São Paulo and that rocked the country in 2013 (orchestrated by the government) should be repeated this year, our people are finally waking up. Each patch proposed an untenable situation, more protests and indignation. In 64, we had the Army to defend ourselves, but now we can only rely on God's help .
Beth C.Costa, journalist, graduate in Political Science
I share personal reflections on Brazil and attempts to establish
communism in the country and our continent , reviewing a bit of history that is
not counted in the books, but recorded during years of observation and reliable
testimony :
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the roots of communism continued to extend and strengthen in the Latin American continent, thanks to the fragile and emerging democracies, under successive dictatorships and coups .
Brazil is no exception, however, managed to save two main attempts to implement communism: the "communist conspiracy" of 1935 , suffocated by the dictator Getulio Vargas, and Backlash in 1964 , when the military took power in hand because there was no alternative to avoid the country to fall into chaos with guerrilla warfare and terrorism.
It is true that the military extinguished civil rights of political exiles, intellectuals and artists, but on the other hand, the economy stabilized during the period of the dictatorship, and promoted a peaceful transition to democracy in 1988. The movement "Direct Now" was a national outcry for the return to democracy, however, the Amnesty Law allowed the real scammers to return home where they continued to conspire against the nation and eventually took power.
Unfortunately, the truth was deliberately distorted and our history books do not record what really happened. The opening of the archives of the dictatorship and the stablishment of the Truth Commission are pure revenge of the terrorists who are now running the country and posing as heroes, occupying high offices and blatantly lie that fought for democracy when in fact the goal was to deploy Castro-communism in Brazil.
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the roots of communism continued to extend and strengthen in the Latin American continent, thanks to the fragile and emerging democracies, under successive dictatorships and coups .
Brazil is no exception, however, managed to save two main attempts to implement communism: the "communist conspiracy" of 1935 , suffocated by the dictator Getulio Vargas, and Backlash in 1964 , when the military took power in hand because there was no alternative to avoid the country to fall into chaos with guerrilla warfare and terrorism.
It is true that the military extinguished civil rights of political exiles, intellectuals and artists, but on the other hand, the economy stabilized during the period of the dictatorship, and promoted a peaceful transition to democracy in 1988. The movement "Direct Now" was a national outcry for the return to democracy, however, the Amnesty Law allowed the real scammers to return home where they continued to conspire against the nation and eventually took power.
Unfortunately, the truth was deliberately distorted and our history books do not record what really happened. The opening of the archives of the dictatorship and the stablishment of the Truth Commission are pure revenge of the terrorists who are now running the country and posing as heroes, occupying high offices and blatantly lie that fought for democracy when in fact the goal was to deploy Castro-communism in Brazil.
The emergence of the Forum of Sao Paulo
After the end of the military dictatorship, Brazil entered a slow and gradual process of democratization, but the danger still haunt the country and the Latin American continent: Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and the union leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva devised a powerful organization extreme left – the Forum of Sao Paulo – to conclude the "widows" of European communism and the rest of the world. Created in 1990 , precisely in Brazil, the Forum of Sao Paulo began collecting socialist political parties and communists around the world, social organizations such as the MST (Movement of the Landless), and various terrorist organizations, among them, FARC, Hamas, Fatah and Hezbollah, extremists and advocates of a false nationalism. The FARC, located in Colombia, is the oldest and largest narco-terrorist organization of our continent, and was the armed wing of the Sao Paulo Forum. At the moment, they are discussing a doubtful peace agreement and demobilization mediated by Havana, with the intention of obtaining the status and rise of political parties in Colombia, imitating what the PT (Workers Party) made in Brazil.
The implementation of the Bolivarian Republic
The main objective of the Forum of São Paulo is to extend the "Socialism of the XXI Century" neo-communist, and transform the Latin American continent in the so-called "Bolivarian Republic" - a nation without borders, with one government , one currency - and hate unprecedented against the "imperialist" U.S. and rich countries to blame for all the ills of economic dependence and social inequalities in the region.
Members of the Forum of Sao Paulo have managed to come to power in several countries, including Nicaragua , Venezuela, Bolivia , Ecuador , Argentina and Uruguay. Currently 15 countries are under the domination of the Forum of Sao Paulo, including Brazil, with the election and re-election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (2003 and 2008) and the continuity of PT (Workers Party) in power through the election of the guerrillas and current president, Dilma Rousseff.
In all countries under the rule of the Forum of Sao Paulo there is a clear predominance of populism, the poor and ethnic minorities are easily transformed into mass of political maneuvering , change constitutions to perpetuate the rulers in power, people are deceived by the so-called plebiscite democracy, when in fact there is no freedom of choice by voting. Participation is only to consecrate the "package" that is ready, and does not cover the basic needs and dignity of education, work, income, health, safety and property of the population.
In my opinion, here are some reasons why the alleged Bolivarian Republic has not yet materialized: the Forum of Sao Paulo has faced resistance in countries where the rule of law still prevails, as Honduras and Paraguay, whose representatives (Manuel Zelaya and Fernando Lugo) were dismissed by the respective Congresses, in strict compliance with the Constitution; realignment with the "right" in some countries, such as Chile and the election of Sebastián Piñera, besides rejection of the Bolivarian rhetoric by El Salvador. Perhaps the greatest obstacle has been the competition for the position of "emperor" of the new republic between Castro, Lula and megalomaniac leader Hugo Chavez, who considered himself the reincarnation of Simon Bolivar and eventually got beaten by cancer, in circumstances that never were clarified. The disappearance of Chavez marked an important low expansionists plans in Sao Paulo Forum, which were elected President Maduro Venezuela through a fraudulent process, full of lies. It has been found that Chavez was not the "favorite of Havana" but Maduro was. At present, when nothing is done without the approval of the Castro brothers, Venezuela became a colony of Cuba . The question is how long a system of this type will survive, when the country continues to face political instability of internal dissent in his own party, and a fragmented opposition. You can no longer hide, poverty and misery have not diminished with petrodollars, generously distributed by the "commander " to finance the revolution in the neighboring countries, however, a good sign is the new consciousness that is emerging in the rejection of governance of Cuba .
Eagle Forum of Sao Paulo in Brazil
The seizure of power in Brazil has been carefully planned by the Forum of Sao Paulo, Lula and Fidel Castro, after the defeat of Castro-Communism in the Military Backlash 1964. For over 20 years, all sectors of society suffered a silent infiltration: Church , army, judiciary, legislature, media, capitalists, unionists, and especially education, the training of a generation of teachers Marxism-Leninism, responsible for fraud and omissions of important historical events and real brainwashing students, inflating them a false nationalism, from primary school to university. Men and women, chest ripe yet stamped the figure of Che Guevara, the bloodthirsty revolutionary that killed hundreds of innocent people, and did not hesitate to betray his comrades .
The apex of this conspiracy was the election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva for his first term as president in 2003. That provoked national and international outrage, the first time that the country chosen a "working President" who did not belong to the "elites". Lula immediately assumed the role of "savior", put on costume moderate left, formed massive "electoral votes” distributing gifts to the poorest sectors of the population through the Bolsa Familia program, the largest program and scandalous vote buying in the world. For this program, 7 in 10 Brazilian stop working with a formal contract to receive money from the government, while the middle class is exploited and subjected to a scorching tax burden. Lula was also elected with the support of bankers and capitalists, represented by Vice President José Alencar , two populist governments earned him an almost unimaginable status, Lula became bigger and more popular than his own party, the PT, giving start the fawning press called "Lullism". The PT then began to face a wave of dissent that led to the "dwarf ", small political parties , the apparent opposition , but all the same poisonous root . And so the old political strategy of "divide and rule" has worked very well in Brazil.
A "cultural revolution"
Despite all the scandals , Lula is still considered a political phenomenon, the result of the last municipal elections proves its popularity and the weight of his party, however, we cannot lose sight of what represents the imposition of this new form of communism in our country. Here the takeover did not happen by force and arms, as in Venezuela under the leadership of Hugo Chavez. Here, Marxism-Leninism receives new clothes by the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci, the takeover happened slowly and gradually in the field of ideas, subtle and ideological indoctrination that has permeated our social structure.
The machinery of State, the demoralization of the armed forces, the imposition of the conflicts between the powers, privileges unreasonable minorities (Indians, blacks and homosexuals), in defiance of the Constitution, attempts to limit freedom of expression, total disregard for Christian values and principles, and the pressure to legalize abortion are taking the country to the division, legal uncertainty and a dangerous moral relativism.
The corruption that was endemic in the country under the auspices of PT became widespread currency exchange, reaching alarming levels. The "judgment of history", the" Mensalão" the Supreme Court found in the guts of this whole conspiracy against the people, against the Treasury, against morality and decency of the rulers and the ruled. But the real boss of all this degrading scheme, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, will not sit on the bench as responsable, has not been and will not be called, and most of the ministers who serve on the Supreme Court were appointed by him and his successor.
There is no political opposition in the country
PT addition, two other political parties that have national significance are the PMDB
(Party of the Brazilian Democratic Movement), the largest of all (considered the Great Whore of the Republic, since the return to democracy in the country), and the PSDB (Party of Brazilian Social Democracy), which alternate in power with PT. In recent years, the PSDB has polarized the political scene with the PT, giving the impression that the country is heading towards bipartisanship. Occasionally one or another member of these parties raises his voice to criticize the government, but are still collusion and conspiracies. Indeed, political parties in Brazil became associations working only for their own benefit and to maintain privileges, no longer represent the interests of the voters who elected them. Voters, in turn, lack of awareness and responsibility, do not know how ti supervise their representatives, demanding accountability and dignified posture . A harbinger of the popular reaction occurred with the "Clean Sheet" project, which received more than one million signatures demanding changes in the electoral law and barring candidates who meet or processes are involved in the embezzlement of public funds. Unfortunately, the laxity of our laws allows a multitude of resources, justice must be one, you have several instances of appeal, which always end up benefiting the wrongdoers. And a sad reality. Vast majority of the existing parties in Brazil today are all socialist-Marxist-Leninist orientation, as we say around here , "all birds of a feather ". Since 2003, when Lula came to power, brighter brazilians have not viable options: left or vote, or vote left, forced to always choose the "least worst".
After the end of the military dictatorship, Brazil entered a slow and gradual process of democratization, but the danger still haunt the country and the Latin American continent: Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and the union leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva devised a powerful organization extreme left – the Forum of Sao Paulo – to conclude the "widows" of European communism and the rest of the world. Created in 1990 , precisely in Brazil, the Forum of Sao Paulo began collecting socialist political parties and communists around the world, social organizations such as the MST (Movement of the Landless), and various terrorist organizations, among them, FARC, Hamas, Fatah and Hezbollah, extremists and advocates of a false nationalism. The FARC, located in Colombia, is the oldest and largest narco-terrorist organization of our continent, and was the armed wing of the Sao Paulo Forum. At the moment, they are discussing a doubtful peace agreement and demobilization mediated by Havana, with the intention of obtaining the status and rise of political parties in Colombia, imitating what the PT (Workers Party) made in Brazil.
The implementation of the Bolivarian Republic
The main objective of the Forum of São Paulo is to extend the "Socialism of the XXI Century" neo-communist, and transform the Latin American continent in the so-called "Bolivarian Republic" - a nation without borders, with one government , one currency - and hate unprecedented against the "imperialist" U.S. and rich countries to blame for all the ills of economic dependence and social inequalities in the region.
Members of the Forum of Sao Paulo have managed to come to power in several countries, including Nicaragua , Venezuela, Bolivia , Ecuador , Argentina and Uruguay. Currently 15 countries are under the domination of the Forum of Sao Paulo, including Brazil, with the election and re-election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (2003 and 2008) and the continuity of PT (Workers Party) in power through the election of the guerrillas and current president, Dilma Rousseff.
In all countries under the rule of the Forum of Sao Paulo there is a clear predominance of populism, the poor and ethnic minorities are easily transformed into mass of political maneuvering , change constitutions to perpetuate the rulers in power, people are deceived by the so-called plebiscite democracy, when in fact there is no freedom of choice by voting. Participation is only to consecrate the "package" that is ready, and does not cover the basic needs and dignity of education, work, income, health, safety and property of the population.
In my opinion, here are some reasons why the alleged Bolivarian Republic has not yet materialized: the Forum of Sao Paulo has faced resistance in countries where the rule of law still prevails, as Honduras and Paraguay, whose representatives (Manuel Zelaya and Fernando Lugo) were dismissed by the respective Congresses, in strict compliance with the Constitution; realignment with the "right" in some countries, such as Chile and the election of Sebastián Piñera, besides rejection of the Bolivarian rhetoric by El Salvador. Perhaps the greatest obstacle has been the competition for the position of "emperor" of the new republic between Castro, Lula and megalomaniac leader Hugo Chavez, who considered himself the reincarnation of Simon Bolivar and eventually got beaten by cancer, in circumstances that never were clarified. The disappearance of Chavez marked an important low expansionists plans in Sao Paulo Forum, which were elected President Maduro Venezuela through a fraudulent process, full of lies. It has been found that Chavez was not the "favorite of Havana" but Maduro was. At present, when nothing is done without the approval of the Castro brothers, Venezuela became a colony of Cuba . The question is how long a system of this type will survive, when the country continues to face political instability of internal dissent in his own party, and a fragmented opposition. You can no longer hide, poverty and misery have not diminished with petrodollars, generously distributed by the "commander " to finance the revolution in the neighboring countries, however, a good sign is the new consciousness that is emerging in the rejection of governance of Cuba .
Eagle Forum of Sao Paulo in Brazil
The seizure of power in Brazil has been carefully planned by the Forum of Sao Paulo, Lula and Fidel Castro, after the defeat of Castro-Communism in the Military Backlash 1964. For over 20 years, all sectors of society suffered a silent infiltration: Church , army, judiciary, legislature, media, capitalists, unionists, and especially education, the training of a generation of teachers Marxism-Leninism, responsible for fraud and omissions of important historical events and real brainwashing students, inflating them a false nationalism, from primary school to university. Men and women, chest ripe yet stamped the figure of Che Guevara, the bloodthirsty revolutionary that killed hundreds of innocent people, and did not hesitate to betray his comrades .
The apex of this conspiracy was the election of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva for his first term as president in 2003. That provoked national and international outrage, the first time that the country chosen a "working President" who did not belong to the "elites". Lula immediately assumed the role of "savior", put on costume moderate left, formed massive "electoral votes” distributing gifts to the poorest sectors of the population through the Bolsa Familia program, the largest program and scandalous vote buying in the world. For this program, 7 in 10 Brazilian stop working with a formal contract to receive money from the government, while the middle class is exploited and subjected to a scorching tax burden. Lula was also elected with the support of bankers and capitalists, represented by Vice President José Alencar , two populist governments earned him an almost unimaginable status, Lula became bigger and more popular than his own party, the PT, giving start the fawning press called "Lullism". The PT then began to face a wave of dissent that led to the "dwarf ", small political parties , the apparent opposition , but all the same poisonous root . And so the old political strategy of "divide and rule" has worked very well in Brazil.
A "cultural revolution"
Despite all the scandals , Lula is still considered a political phenomenon, the result of the last municipal elections proves its popularity and the weight of his party, however, we cannot lose sight of what represents the imposition of this new form of communism in our country. Here the takeover did not happen by force and arms, as in Venezuela under the leadership of Hugo Chavez. Here, Marxism-Leninism receives new clothes by the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci, the takeover happened slowly and gradually in the field of ideas, subtle and ideological indoctrination that has permeated our social structure.
The machinery of State, the demoralization of the armed forces, the imposition of the conflicts between the powers, privileges unreasonable minorities (Indians, blacks and homosexuals), in defiance of the Constitution, attempts to limit freedom of expression, total disregard for Christian values and principles, and the pressure to legalize abortion are taking the country to the division, legal uncertainty and a dangerous moral relativism.
The corruption that was endemic in the country under the auspices of PT became widespread currency exchange, reaching alarming levels. The "judgment of history", the" Mensalão" the Supreme Court found in the guts of this whole conspiracy against the people, against the Treasury, against morality and decency of the rulers and the ruled. But the real boss of all this degrading scheme, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, will not sit on the bench as responsable, has not been and will not be called, and most of the ministers who serve on the Supreme Court were appointed by him and his successor.
There is no political opposition in the country
PT addition, two other political parties that have national significance are the PMDB
(Party of the Brazilian Democratic Movement), the largest of all (considered the Great Whore of the Republic, since the return to democracy in the country), and the PSDB (Party of Brazilian Social Democracy), which alternate in power with PT. In recent years, the PSDB has polarized the political scene with the PT, giving the impression that the country is heading towards bipartisanship. Occasionally one or another member of these parties raises his voice to criticize the government, but are still collusion and conspiracies. Indeed, political parties in Brazil became associations working only for their own benefit and to maintain privileges, no longer represent the interests of the voters who elected them. Voters, in turn, lack of awareness and responsibility, do not know how ti supervise their representatives, demanding accountability and dignified posture . A harbinger of the popular reaction occurred with the "Clean Sheet" project, which received more than one million signatures demanding changes in the electoral law and barring candidates who meet or processes are involved in the embezzlement of public funds. Unfortunately, the laxity of our laws allows a multitude of resources, justice must be one, you have several instances of appeal, which always end up benefiting the wrongdoers. And a sad reality. Vast majority of the existing parties in Brazil today are all socialist-Marxist-Leninist orientation, as we say around here , "all birds of a feather ". Since 2003, when Lula came to power, brighter brazilians have not viable options: left or vote, or vote left, forced to always choose the "least worst".
"Spring in Brazil "?
The demonstrations which began with protests against the increase in R$ 0,20 in urban rates in the city of São Paulo and that rocked the country in 2013 (orchestrated by the government) should be repeated this year, our people are finally waking up. Each patch proposed an untenable situation, more protests and indignation. In 64, we had the Army to defend ourselves, but now we can only rely on God's help .
Beth C.Costa, journalist, graduate in Political Science
Las Farc se tomaron por 2 días la Universidad Nacional
Por UnoAmerica
Integrantes de las Farc, desde la Universidad Nacional, festejan los 50 años de terror en los que han tenido sumergido al pueblo colombiano.
Jueves, 29 de Mayo de 2014
El rector de la Universidad Nacional,
Ignacio Mantilla, rechazó la toma de las instalaciones del Alma Mater por un
grupo de encapuchados, y aseguró que las universidades son un espacio
académico y no de violencia.
Personas vestidas totalmente de negro
con chaquetas y pasamontañas, formaron y después se dirigieron
coordinadamente a varios puntos de la universidad. Se trataba de integrantes
del grupo terrorista de las Farc festejando el cumpleaños número 50.
En los 2 días que duró el
desafortunado evento de la universidad, repartieron discos que contienen
videos, documentos y fotografías haciendo propaganda a las Farc. De acuerdo
con las autoridades, los explosivos que encontraron y los que utilizaron eran
de mayor poder que las comunes “papas bomba”, y el ataque fue muy intenso.
Las directivas de la universidad
anunciaron que en los próximos días de reunirán con el Secretario Distrital
de Gobierno y la Policía con el fin que se eviten estos actos de
vandalismo.
. |
Surge un nuevo movimiento democrático dentro de Cuba
Por UnoAmerica
El joven ingeniero Eliécer Ávila crea en la Isla el Movimiento Somos +. Es otra prueba de que los cubanos aspiran a vivir en libertad
Viernes, 30 de Mayo de 2014
Carta a los jóvenes cubanos.
por Eliécer Ávila
No le hago un cumplido a nadie cuando
afirmo que los cubanos podemos construir una de las sociedades más modernas,
participativas y desarrolladas de nuestro tiempo.
Nuestro país tiene todo lo que
necesita para emprender el camino hacia el estado de bienestar y la calidad
de vida de su pueblo. Pero carece de un sistema político adecuado, que
remueva las oxidadas bases históricas que rigen la vida en el país,
depositando sobre el individuo la responsabilidad para el logro de sus
proyectos, sin interferencias arbitrarias y creando las mejores condiciones
para su total desarrollo en libertad.
Como joven me he preguntado muchas
veces: ¿Qué sería mejor? ¿Acaso esperar a que la muy acomodada dirección
histórica de la revolución decida algún día tomar conciencia de su
responsabilidad y emprenda los cambios reales que el país necesita?
¿Acaso irme del país como miles de
cubanos para intentar realizarme como ser humano en otras tierras?
¿Acaso hacerme cómplice de la clase
dominante, acomodándome en un puesto desde el cual le sirvo al amo y a cambio
gano confort y tranquilidad, olvidándome del resto de los cubanos y de sus
necesidades?
¿Acaso hacerme el tonto, no mirar a
mí alrededor, inventarme una felicidad efímera y artificial, reírme a
carcajadas en la esquina y robar en mi centro de trabajo lo que puedo para
comer y vestir?
¿Acaso meterme en el lucrativo
negocio de algunos “culturosos” e “intelectualosos” que dicen verdades a
medias para no quedar mal ante sus públicos pero que por detrás del telón
disfrutan de excepcionales privilegios que el estado les otorga por no decir
toda la verdad?
Por más que analizo esas variantes,
que muchos escogen a mí alrededor, no me siento cómodo con ninguna. Mi
conciencia no deja de gritarme, de presionarme, de recordarme que tengo un
deber, y no es otro que intentar que mi país despierte de su prolongado sueño
y empiece a moverse antes de que sea imposible alcanzar al resto del mundo,
cada vez más dinámico y veloz. Seguramente no soy el único que siente ese
llamado, miles de jóvenes a lo largo y ancho del país se debaten entre las
mismas dudas, los mismos pensamientos, los mismos sueños. Pero nos han dicho
que no podemos, que no llegaremos, que no somos capaces… todo eso es falso,
las verdaderas barreras están en nuestras mentes, han sido puestas allí con
una sola intención: que nos rindamos antes de intentarlo.
Los hombres y mujeres que integramos
este movimiento, asumimos el reto y la responsabilidad que la historia nos
impone: demostrar que en el seno de nuestra maltrecha sociedad aún existen
personas que pueden levantar la bandera de la esperanza y emprender, tanto en
lo material como lo espiritual, la reconstrucción de la patria.
Yo los invito a todos ustedes,
convencido de que esta lucha es justa, a no dejarnos rendir como generación.
¡Paz, desarrollo y vida para nuestro
pueblo!
Ing. Eliecer L. Ávila Cicilia
|
sexta-feira, 30 de maio de 2014
Dilma decidiu extinguir a democracia por decreto. É golpe!
Foto Coluna Grita Brasil - Opinião e Notícia
Atenção, leitores!
Seus direitos, neste exato momento,
estão sendo roubados, solapados, diminuídos. A menos que você seja um membro do
MTST, do MST, de uma dessas siglas que optaram pela truculência como forma de
expressão política.
De mansinho, o PT e a presidente Dilma
Rousseff resolveram instalar no país a ditadura petista por decreto. Leiam o
conteúdo do decreto 8.243, de 23
de maio deste ano, que cria uma tal “Política Nacional de Participação Social”
e um certo “Sistema Nacional de Participação Social”. O Estadão escreve nesta
quinta um excelente editorial a
respeito. Trata-se de um texto escandalosamente inconstitucional, que afronta o
fundamento da igualdade perante a lei, que fere o princípio da representação
democrática e cria uma categoria de aristocratas com poderes acima dos outros
cidadãos: a dos membros de “movimentos sociais”.
O que faz o decreto da digníssima
presidente? Em primeiro lugar, define o que é “sociedade civil” em vários
incisos do Artigo 2º. Logo o inciso I é uma graça, a saber: “I – sociedade
civil – o cidadão, os coletivos, os movimentos sociais institucionalizados ou
não institucionalizados, suas redes e suas organizações”.
Pronto! Cabe qualquer coisa aí. Afinal,
convenham: tudo aquilo que não é institucional é, por natureza, não
institucional. Em seguida, o texto da Soberana estabelece que “todos os órgãos
da administração pública direta ou indireta” contarão, em seus conselhos, com
representantes dessa tal sociedade civil — que, como já vimos, será tudo aquilo
que o governo de turno decidir que é… sociedade civil
Todos os órgãos da gestão pública,
incluindo agências reguladoras, por exemplo, estariam submetidos aos tais
movimentos sociais — que, de resto, sabemos, são controlados pelo PT. Ao
estabelecer em lei a sua participação na administração pública, os petistas
querem se eternizar no poder, ganhem ou percam as eleições.
Isso que a presidente está chamando de
“sistema de participação” é, na verdade, um sistema de tutela. Parte do
princípio antidemocrático de que aqueles que participam dos ditos movimentos
sociais são mais cidadãos do que os que não participam. Criam-se, com esse
texto, duas categorias de brasileiros: os que têm direito de participar da vida
pública e os que não têm. Alguém dirá: “Ora, basta integrar um movimento
social”. Mas isso implicará, necessariamente, ter de se vincular a um partido
político.
A Constituição brasileira assegura o
direito à livre manifestação e consagra a forma da democracia representativa:
por meio de eleições livres, que escolhem o Parlamento. O que Dilma está
fazendo, por decreto, é criar uma outra categoria de representação, que não passa
pelo processo eletivo. Trata-se de uma iniciativa que busca corroer por dentro
o regime democrático.
O PT está tentando consolidar um
comissariado à moda soviética. Trata-se de um golpe institucional. Será um
escândalo se a Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil não recorrer ao Supremo contra
essa excrescência. Com esse decreto, os petistas querem, finalmente, tornar
obsoletas as eleições. O texto segue o melhor padrão da ditadura venezuelana e
das protoditaduras de Bolívia, Equador e Nicarágua. Afinal, na América Latina,
hoje em dia, os golpes são dados pelas esquerdas, pela via aparentemente legal.
Inconformado com a democracia, o PT
quer agora extingui-la por decreto.
Por
Reinaldo Azevedo
http://veja.abril.com.br/blog/reinaldo/geral/dilma-decidiu-extinguir-a-democracia-por-decreto-e-golpe/
|
quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014
EL CONTINENTE ESTÁ EN MANOS DE LA IZQUIERDA
Por Ricardo Angoso
Mayo 29 de 2014
“Todo el continente
está en manos de la izquierda y no se ve salida a esta crisis”: Adolfo Castells
Adolfo Castells es, a sus 77 años, uno de las voces
más autorizadas del mundo político, intelectual y diplomático de Uruguay. Es
escritor y se ha desempeñado como diplomático en numerosos destinos, como
Washington, Roma, San Pablo, París, Madrid y Londres. Su larga experiencia en
la política latinoamericana y también en el exterior del continente, junto con
sus estudios sobre la realidad uruguaya, le han llevado a un análisis muy
crítico del actual momento por el que pasa América Latina y también su país,
que en su opinión vive un “carnaval autoritario de corte progresista”, tal como
ha denunciado en uno de sus últimos libros publicados.
Ricardo Angoso:¿Cómo ve estado del continente,
parece qué está muy revuelto?
Adolfo Castells: Se ve y constata que la
Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) ya no es lo que era y no funciona como
debiera. Cuando la OEA estaba bajo el dominio de los Estados Unidos al menos
había tres o cuatro países independientes y que incluso votaban contra
resoluciones que presentaban, como era el caso de Uruguay. Por ejemplo, cuando
se habló de romper relaciones diplomáticas con Cuba, que solicitaban los
Estados Unidos, Uruguay se opuso. Cuando se expulsó a Cuba de la OEA, nuestro
país estaba de acuerdo pero con romper relaciones, como se pretendía, no
estábamos de acuerdo. No aceptamos esa recomendación. Uruguay, México y Chile
eran países muy independientes y actuaban de acuerdo a sus criterios en la OEA.
No se votaba de acuerdo a lo que decían los Estados Unidos.
Ahora, sin embargo, vemos como toda América Latina
vota lo que diga Venezuela y observamos cómo solo se le opone Panamá a sus
propuestas. Y luego solamente Estados Unidos y Canadá parecen gozar de cierta
autonomía con respecto a este asunto. Todos los demás países, sin excepción, se
negaron a tratar el asunto de Venezuela en la OEA en sesión abierta. Se habla
del “imperialismo norteamericano”, pero lo que se detecta es cada vez es que
Washington tiene menos influencia en el continente y, por el contrario, el
populismo chavista tiene cada vez más peso, excepto en Panamá, como he dicho
antes.
R.A.:¿Y a qué se debe esa crisis de la OEA?
A.C.:La OEA está en crisis hace mucho tiempo. Quizá
porque Estados Unidos se desinteresó en cierta medida de la región y le dio
menos importancia. Pero la razón fundamental es que llegó la ola populista a la
región impulsada por Chávez y la OEA se convirtió en una pieza de esa política.
Hasta su Secretario General, Insulza, comulga con esas ideas populistas. Mejor
dicho, siendo un hombre capaz e inteligente, Insulza se convirtió en un lacayo
del populismo chavista.
R.A.:¿Parece que el Foro de Sao Paulo, nacido de la
fusión de las fuerzas de izquierda del continente tras la Guerra Fría, ha tenido
mucha influencia en todas estas políticas?
A.C.:Pues sí, está claro. Ha tenido influencia
porque, de hecho, los gobiernos han ido cayendo uno a uno en manos de partidos
que estaban en manos del Foro de Sao Paulo. Para mí, desde luego, es una
desgracia. Primero fue Chávez, en Venezuela, aunque antes había caído Cuba en
manos comunistas, y luego fueron cayendo uno todos los países, incluso
Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay.
R.A.:¿Pero en Uruguay no ha habido cambios
fundamentales, tanto en lo político como en lo económico?
A.C.: Es cierto. La cuestión económica la ha
preservado, pero el país no aprovechó la coyuntura fantástica que tuvo en estos
años. Y esa coyuntura tan favorable no fue por méritos del presidente Múgica y
el partido que le sustenta, el Frente Amplio, sino por la coyuntura
internacional tan favorable. Subieron las materias primas, los comodities, y
eso impulsó a las exportaciones uruguayas. Sin embargo, no se aprovechó ese
dinero para hacer inversiones y el dinero recibido se malgastó. Se multiplicó
la deuda externa y no se emplearon bien los recursos. Luego se dejó a la
economía privada funcionar, es cierto, pero no es menos cierto que se hizo para
poder pagar sus errores, como el aumento en los cargos de confianza. Les
convenía.
terça-feira, 27 de maio de 2014
Leitura Recomendada - "O Verdadeiro Che"
"Só
"Só os
idiotas úteis idolatram Che Guevara", diz o autor do livro, o jornalista e
cientista político Humberto Fontova, que fugiu de Cuba com a família em 1961. O
livro acompanha o documentário "Guevara: Anatomia de um Mito". O
"revolucionário" líder é descrito como "um médico fracassado, e
um estrategista militar incompetente". Chegou a ser condecorado com a
Ordem do Cruzeiro, pelo então presidente Jânio Quadros. A honra da sua execução
coube a militares bolivianos em 9 de outubro de 1967.
O
Verdadeiro Che Guevara
Autor: Humberto Fontova
Editora: É Realizações
Preço promocional: R$ 39,90
Fonte:
http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/livrariadafolha/2014/05/1460132-so-idiotas-idolatram-che-diz-fugitivo-de-cuba.shtml
Las FARC cumplen hoy 50 años. Estas son las cifras que ha dejado el conflicto del grupo terrorista en Colombia
Inicio y saldo del proceso
Las FARC,
un grupo terrorista de 50 años, ha desafiado gobiernos y marcado la historia de
Colombia con una lucha fallida por el poder que deja millones de víctimas.
A
continuación cinco claves para entender el conflicto armado, que actualmente
intentan resolver las FARC y el gobierno de Juan Manuel Santos a través de un
proceso de paz que se cumple en Cuba desde noviembre de 2012.
1. ¿Cómo
comenzó?
Después
del asesinato del caudillo liberal Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, el 9 de abril de 1948,
se desata un enfrentamiento a muerte entre liberales y conservadores, entonces
en el gobierno. Una amnistía, en 1953, y un acuerdo para la alternancia en el
poder, en 1957, acaban con la violencia interpartidaria.
Sin
embargo, exinsurgentes campesinos liberales se organizaron para reclamar una
reforma agraria en territorios bajo influencia comunista llamados
"repúblicas independientes", que el Estado intentó reconquistar por
la fuerza en 1964. Al mando de Manuel Marulanda, unos 50 campesinos
sobrevivieron al ataque, formaron las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de
Colombia (FARC) y adoptaron como fecha fundacional el 27 de mayo de 1964.
Al inicio
fueron un grupo de autodefensa que reivindicaba la lucha radical agraria, luego
incorporaron el discurso marxista-leninista, y, tras la caída de la Unión
Soviética, el bolivariano de corte nacionalista.
2. ¿Cómo
han sobrevivido?
Las FARC
han sobrevivido gracias a su capacidad para moverse entre montañas y selvas, al
reclutamiento campesino voluntario o forzoso, y desde los años 1980 al
financiamiento por extorsión, secuestro y narcotráfico.
Las FARC
reconocen que cobran un impuesto a los cultivadores de hoja de coca -materia
prima de la cocaína-, pero niegan ser un cártel del narcotráfico como señala
Estados Unidos. Cuando surgieron eran un grupo de 50 campesinos armados, en los
ochenta tenían unos 8.000 combatientes y hacia finales de los noventa -su época
de mayor expansión y poderío- tenían 16.000 hombres y mujeres en armas.
Actualmente cuentan con unos 8.000 terroristas. Las cifras son cálculos del
Ejército o independientes, porque las FARC nunca han revelado su pie de fuerza.
3. ¿Qué reclaman?
Históricamente
las FARC han exigido redistribuir la propiedad de la tierra, una nueva
Constitución y garantías para convertirse en un partido político, tras el
asesinato a manos de paramilitares, con ayuda de agentes del Estado, de unos
3.000 simpatizantes, militantes y dirigentes de la Unión Patriótica, partido de
izquierda creado en 1985 por exmiembros de las FARC.
Las FARC
han intentado negociar la paz con los gobiernos del conservador Belisario
Betancur (1982-1986), del liberal César Gaviria (1990-1994), y del conservador
Andrés Pastrana (1998-2002). Desde noviembre de 2012, llevan a cabo en Cuba un
proceso de paz con el liberal de derecha Juan Manuel Santos.
4. ¿Cuál
es el saldo del conflicto?
El conflicto
en Colombia, en el que han participado también paramilitares de derecha,
militares y narcotraficantes, ha dejado 220.000 muertos -180.000 de ellos
civiles- y 25.000 desaparecidos entre 1958 y 2012, según el estatal Centro
Nacional de Memoria Histórica. La oficina de la ONU para los refugiados cifra
en 5,1 millones los desplazados por la violencia, la mayoría campesinos.
Según el
instituto forense, en 2012 hubo 13.859 homicidios en Colombia, 933 de ellos
relacionados con el conflicto armado, es decir 6,7%. En 2012, el gasto militar
colombiano alcanzó 3,3% del Producto Interno Bruto (PIB), unos 12.177 millones
de dólares.
5.
¿Quiénes son los otros protagonistas?
Las
Fuerzas Armadas de Colombia, que actualmente cuentan con casi medio millón de
militares y policías. Doce gobiernos que han intentado negociar o terminar por
la fuerza con las FARC, entre ellos el de Álvaro Uribe (2002-2010), quien le
propinó los mayores golpes militares. Los paramilitares de derecha (ya
desmovilizados). Y Estados Unidos, que ha rechazado a las FARC primero por su
comunismo y luego por su relación con las drogas.
Washington
ha financiado desde el año 2000 la mayor ofensiva contrainsurgente en Colombia,
al incluir a las FARC en su lista de grupos terroristas.
Publicado
el 27 Mayo 2014
Fuentes:
AFP/NTN24
http://www.canalntn24.com/node/133898
http://www.canalntn24.com/node/133898
Blog Notalatina EXCLUSIVO: Eleições na Colômbia vão para o segundo turno
Domingo, 25 de março de 2014
Graça Salgueiro
Graça Salgueiro
As
eleições mais importantes do nosso continente ocorreram hoje, na Colômbia, que
elegia um novo presidente. Desejávamos todos, colombianos e eu, que a contenda
fosse resolvida no primeiro turno mas apesar de não ter havido fraudes do tipo
das venezuelanas, Santos, acolitado pela imprensa, tentou de todas as formas
até impedir a candidatura de Oscar Iván Zuluaga do Centro Democrático, partido
fundado pelo atual senador e ex-presidente Uribe.
Faltando
uma semana para as eleições, a revista Semana, de propriedade da família
Santos, armou uma montagem fraudulenta de um vídeo onde aparece o candidato
Zuluaga “tramando” um golpe de Estado contra Santos, conforme denunciei na
edição anterior a essa. Experts de várias empresas fizeram a perícia e
apontaram entre 17 e 30 edições, o que caracterizava o crime. O advogado de
Zuluaga, Dr Jaime Granados, fez uma denúncia no Ministério Público com essas
provas, porém, para espanto de todos tal ministério não analisou o vídeo
fraudado mas o original, afirmando no final que “o vídeo é autêntico”. E foi assim,
com essa espada de Damocles sobre a cabeça que Zuluaga partiu para enfrentar os
eleitores.
Enquanto
escrevo essa nota ouço o pronunciamento da candidata Marta Lucía Ramírez, que
concorreu sem apoio do seu partido, foi boicotada pelos meios de comunicação e
não contou com grandes recursos financeiros mas conseguiu um honroso terceiro
lugar. A rádio transmitia seu discurso quando Santos resolveu fazer o seu
também, uma vez que com 99,84% dos votos escrutinados em todo o país já se
sabia que haverá segundo turno, e esta foi grosseiramente interrompida para que
o atual presidente falasse. Ainda não tenho esse vídeo mas tão logo ele seja
divulgado, publicarei.
Então, o
resultado ficou assim, conforme se vê neste link, demonstrando o total geral do
país. Ficou evidente que a maioria dos colombianos não querem a re-eleição. Por
outro lado, os responsáveis pela campanha de Santos falsificaram as contas de
Twitter de Uribe e Zuluaga, e hoje de manhã bem cedo lia-se na falsa conta de
Zuluaga um apelo aos colombianos para que votassem em branco onde se lia: “Hoje
os colombianos celebramos a democracia, exercendo nosso direito ao voto por
#UnaColombiaDistinta #VotoEnBlanco”. Essa disparidade fez com que os
eleitores fossem confundidos o que levou a um percentual de 60% de abstenções.
Essa foi, como disse Dr. Fernando
Londoño, a quarta vitória de Uribe (duas dos seus mandatos como presidente, uma
como senador e agora com Zuluaga), pois com pouco tempo de campanha, lutando
contra todo tipo de patifarias, fraudes, enquanto Santos utilizava a máquina
estatal para fazer todo tipo de chantagens, pagamento de “bônus” que os
colombianos chamam de “mermelada” para comprar votos, chegou a esse resultado
magnífico de 29,26% contra 25,67% de Santos. Em seu discurso cheio de ódio ele
convocou os outros candidatos para juntar-se a ele no segundo turno, alegando
que “quem está contra seu projeto de ‘paz’ com as FARC, são inimigos da paz”.
Enfim, enquanto não tenho os
pronunciamentos dos dois candidatos que vão para o segundo turno, faço essa
publicação preliminar com os resultados numéricos. Nos próximos dias farei
outras atualizações sobre esta importantíssima eleição e hoje, no programa
“Mata Rato Connection” da Radio Vox, estarei comentando mais
detalhadamente. Fiquem com Deus e até a próxima!
http://notalatina.blogspot.com.br/2014/05/exclusivo-eleicoes-na-colombia-vao-para.html
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)